BondPrint models relationship experience across interacting psychological and behavioral dimensions rather than treating relationships as the product of one personality trait.
Some dimensions map onto established research constructs; others are BondPrint syntheses — groupings BondPrint created from related research. Each construct below is labeled honestly, and the underlying sources are cited on the research page.
Attachment
- Definition
- How you experience security, separation, uncertainty, and reassurance with the people who matter most — the bond-maintenance system described in attachment research.
- What it is not
- Not a fixed identity or a three-box label. The same person can feel secure in one relationship and activated in another.
- Example
- Noticing whether a partner's two-day quiet spell registers as ordinary weather or as a slow alarm.
- Related constructs
- Relational safety · Certainty and ambiguity tolerance · Stress response
- How BondPrint explores it
- Scenario and frequency questions about separation, silence, reassurance, and recovery — assessed at baseline and, separately, per relationship.
- Research basis
- Attachment theory (Bowlby) and adult attachment research (Mikulincer & Shaver).
Bonding
- Definition
- BondPrint uses "bonding" for what creates emotional closeness and makes someone important to you: shared moments, rituals, disclosure, and felt significance.
- What it is not
- Not mere time spent together, and not the same as attachment — bonds can deepen without anxiety ever being involved.
- Example
- The weekly ritual that would leave a hole if it vanished, even though no single instance seems important.
- Related constructs
- Attachment · Continuity · Recognition and appreciation
- How BondPrint explores it
- Questions about what has actually built closeness in your history, not what you believe should.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint grouping informed by research on positive connection moments (Fredrickson) and love as practice (hooks).
Caregiving
- Definition
- How you notice a loved one's need and act to protect, support, or comfort — the giving counterpart of attachment.
- What it is not
- Not control, self-erasure, or fixing. Presence-based care and action-based care are both caregiving.
- Example
- Whether your first instinct with a struggling partner is to solve, to soothe, or to witness.
- Related constructs
- Provisioning and opportunity creation · Responsiveness · Repair
- How BondPrint explores it
- Behavioral-choice questions about how you respond when someone you love struggles, and what care you register when it's aimed at you.
- Research basis
- Research on social support and thriving through relationships (Feeney & Collins).
Provisioning and opportunity creation
- Definition
- BondPrint groups under this term the expression of love through supplying and building: resources, stability, opened doors, and materially possible futures.
- What it is not
- Not transactional love or emotional avoidance — though it is frequently misread as both.
- Example
- Taking the worse schedule so a partner can retrain for the career they want.
- Related constructs
- Caregiving · Future orientation · Recognition and appreciation
- How BondPrint explores it
- Trade-off questions that reveal whether provisioning is a primary channel through which you give — or register — love.
- Research basis
- This is a synthesis informed by research on caregiving and support in relationships (Feeney & Collins; Fromm on love as active concern).
Relational safety
- Definition
- BondPrint uses this term for the felt conditions under which you can disagree, need, fail, and reveal yourself without bracing for rupture.
- What it is not
- Not comfort or conflict-avoidance. A polite relationship can be unsafe; a stormy one can be deeply safe.
- Example
- Being able to say "I'm struggling" before you have a plan for it.
- Related constructs
- Attachment · Repair · Autonomy
- How BondPrint explores it
- Questions about what lets you tell the truth, what shuts you down, and what happened when safety broke before.
- Research basis
- A synthesis informed by attachment security research and observational conflict research (Gottman).
Certainty and ambiguity tolerance
- Definition
- How much not-knowing — about feelings, definition, or future — you can hold before it becomes costly, and what uncertainty activates in you.
- What it is not
- Discomfort with ambiguity is not neediness; ease with it is not indifference.
- Example
- An undefined relationship that one person experiences as freedom and the other as low-grade alarm.
- Related constructs
- Attachment · Stress response · Future orientation
- How BondPrint explores it
- Scenarios involving mixed signals, silence, and undefined situations, with discomfort-scale responses.
- Research basis
- Adult attachment research on ambiguity and availability (Mikulincer & Shaver).
Desire
- Definition
- How attraction, emotional connection, novelty, safety, and reciprocity interact in what draws you toward someone and keeps drawing you.
- What it is not
- Not reducible to frequency or intensity; and not the same system as attachment — research treats them as distinct.
- Example
- Whether desire for you grows from safety and familiarity, or needs distance and newness to breathe.
- Related constructs
- Bonding · Autonomy · Attachment
- How BondPrint explores it
- Optional, consent-gated questions about the conditions under which desire rises and fades for you.
- Research basis
- Research distinguishing desire, attraction, and attachment systems (Fisher) and self-expansion through novelty (Aron & Aron).
Autonomy
- Definition
- Your need for self-direction inside closeness — room to remain a distinct person while belonging to someone.
- What it is not
- Not the opposite of intimacy. Self-determination research treats autonomy and relatedness as complementary needs, not rivals.
- Example
- The difference between missing a partner during a solo week and feeling guilty for enjoying it.
- Related constructs
- Relational safety · Shared identity · Desire
- How BondPrint explores it
- Trade-off questions between togetherness and self-direction across time, decisions, and identity.
- Research basis
- Self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan).
Responsiveness
- Definition
- How reliably a partner's response to your reaching — with a need, a joy, a fear — leaves you feeling understood, validated, and cared for.
- What it is not
- Not agreement or constant availability; a partner can respond well while saying no.
- Example
- Sharing good news and watching whether it is met with genuine engagement or a distracted nod.
- Related constructs
- Caregiving · Recognition and appreciation · Repair
- How BondPrint explores it
- Questions about what happens after you reach — and what you do when the response disappoints.
- Research basis
- Research on support and perceived responsiveness in relationships (Feeney & Collins).
Recognition and appreciation
- Definition
- How much being seen, named, and thanked matters to you — and through which channels appreciation actually registers.
- What it is not
- Not vanity. Observational research links a high appreciation-to-criticism ratio with relationship stability.
- Example
- Effort that goes unmentioned for months, and what that silence does to the effort.
- Related constructs
- Responsiveness · Bonding · Caregiving
- How BondPrint explores it
- Questions about which forms of acknowledgment land, and what its absence costs you.
- Research basis
- Observational couples research on appreciation and criticism (Gottman).
Continuity
- Definition
- BondPrint uses "continuity" for the need for rhythm and thread in a connection: regular contact, kept rituals, and a sense that the relationship persists between meetings.
- What it is not
- Not clinginess or routine for its own sake — continuity is about the thread, not the frequency.
- Example
- A missed goodnight message that means nothing to one partner and breaks the day's thread for the other.
- Related constructs
- Bonding · Certainty and ambiguity tolerance · Attachment
- How BondPrint explores it
- Questions about rhythm, ritual, and what a break in contact does to your sense of the bond.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint grouping informed by research on connection as repeated small moments (Fredrickson).
Future orientation
- Definition
- How commitment, long-term investment, and a jointly imagined future function for you — whether the future is where your love lives or where it is tested.
- What it is not
- Not the same as dedication being present: commitment research distinguishes wanting a future (dedication) from feeling stuck in one (constraint).
- Example
- Whether planning next year together feels like a gift or a wall.
- Related constructs
- Shared identity · Provisioning and opportunity creation · Certainty and ambiguity tolerance
- How BondPrint explores it
- Questions about investment, alternatives, dedication, and what already-built history does to your staying.
- Research basis
- The investment model of commitment (Rusbult) and dedication/constraint research (Stanley & Markman).
Stress response
- Definition
- What changes in you when connection feels uncertain or threatened: which protective strategy fires first, how strong it runs, and how long your system takes to settle.
- What it is not
- Not your character. Stress responses are states with patterns, and they can differ per relationship.
- Example
- Going quiet to avoid saying something ruinous — and having the quiet itself read as abandonment.
- Related constructs
- Attachment · Repair · Relational safety
- How BondPrint explores it
- Scenario questions about conflict, silence, and threat, plus time-to-recover questions after rupture.
- Research basis
- Adult attachment research on threat responses (Mikulincer & Shaver) and research on physiological flooding (Gottman).
Repair
- Definition
- What helps trust, safety, and intimacy return after disconnection — your repair channels, timing, and confidence that ruptures mend.
- What it is not
- Not appeasement, and not necessarily verbal. A quick "sorry" that closes the topic can be repair's opposite.
- Example
- "Can we start over?" offered mid-argument — and whether it lands as rescue or evasion for you.
- Related constructs
- Stress response · Relational safety · Responsiveness
- How BondPrint explores it
- Questions about what has actually restored closeness for you, how long you need, and what a partner can do that works.
- Research basis
- Observational research on repair attempts and relationship stability (Gottman).
Material autonomy and exit capacity
- Definition
- BondPrint's Material Autonomy / Exit Capacity framework describes how much each person could practically maintain their own life — housing, income, daily needs — and whether leaving a relationship would remain materially possible for both people, even when neither intends to leave.
- What it is not
- Not a measure of love, commitment, or fairness. Deep material interdependence can be a freely chosen shape of closeness; independence can coexist with profound commitment. Financial asymmetry alone never implies coercion.
- Example
- One partner quietly noticing that leaving would also mean losing their home — and the other partner wondering, just as quietly, how voluntary the staying really is.
- Related constructs
- Freedom-choice valuation · Autonomy-oriented provision · Commitment
- How BondPrint explores it
- Optional scenario and trade-off questions about financial independence, the cost of leaving, and support that creates options — never direct agreement items.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis, not a validated standalone scale. It draws conceptually on research on autonomy support and self-determination (Deci & Ryan), relationship investment and dependence (Rusbult), constraint versus dedication commitment (Stanley & Markman), and secure-base support and caregiving (Feeney & Collins).
Freedom-choice valuation
- Definition
- How much the emotional meaning of being chosen depends, for a given person, on the chooser being genuinely free — practically and materially — not to choose them.
- What it is not
- Not a ranking of relationship styles. Experiencing mutual reliance as intimacy and experiencing free choice as the deepest proof of love are different meanings of commitment, not better and worse ones.
- Example
- Hearing "I choose you" from someone who could walk away without losing anything — and noticing whether that lands as more meaningful, less safe, or simply different.
- Related constructs
- Material autonomy and exit capacity · Voluntary choice salience · Commitment
- How BondPrint explores it
- Trade-off scenarios ("in which relationship would I choose you feel more powerful?") and emotional-reaction items, because almost everyone agrees with direct statements about wanting free partners.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by self-determination theory's account of autonomous motivation (Deci & Ryan) and commitment research distinguishing dedication from constraint (Stanley & Markman).
Dependency ambiguity
- Definition
- The uncertainty that can surround why someone stays in a relationship when leaving would carry substantial practical cost — an ambiguity about the meaning of staying, felt by either or both people, that belongs to the situation rather than to a person.
- What it is not
- Not a trait, and never scored by BondPrint. It is not an accusation that anyone stays for the wrong reasons — it names why the question can become hard to answer with confidence, for everyone involved.
- Example
- A partner saying "I love you, but leaving would also mean losing my home" — and both people quietly carrying the question that sentence opens.
- Related constructs
- Material autonomy and exit capacity · Freedom-choice valuation · Relationship uncertainty
- How BondPrint explores it
- As educational framing only. BondPrint explores whether support creates felt obligation, whether each person feels free to say no, and whether exit remains materially possible — without ever inferring coercion from inequality alone.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by investment-model research on dependence (Rusbult) and commitment research on constraint (Stanley & Markman).
Autonomy-oriented provision
- Definition
- A way of giving practical support whose felt success is the other person's growing independence — providing so that, one day, the provision itself becomes unnecessary.
- What it is not
- Not superior to security-oriented provision, which aims to make a loved one's present life easier and safer. Both are complete ways of loving. It also creates no entitlement: helping someone become free never means they owe anything back.
- Example
- Choosing to fund a partner's training over upgrading the shared apartment — because their widening options feel like the point of the support.
- Related constructs
- Material autonomy and exit capacity · Legacy of love · Caregiving
- How BondPrint explores it
- Optional scenarios about how resources would be used and what outcome of years of support would feel most like success.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by secure-base support research — support that fuels exploration rather than dependence (Feeney & Collins) — and autonomy support in self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan).
Vulnerability intimacy
- Definition
- BondPrint uses this term for the degree to which closeness is experienced through sharing struggles, imperfections, fears, health concerns, uncertainty, or dependency needs — trusting someone with the parts of you that need care.
- What it is not
- Not inherently romantic or non-romantic, and not the whole of intimacy. Sharing vulnerability does not automatically satisfy a partner's separate need for romance, admiration, or fascination — they are different routes to closeness, not substitutes.
- Example
- Feeling safest being unpolished around someone — and noticing whether that unpolished closeness reads to them as intimacy, or as a role.
- Related constructs
- Aspirational courtship · Caregiving · Relational safety
- How BondPrint explores it
- Optional scenario and preference questions about where closeness actually deepens for you — through shared struggle, or through other channels. Low readings are a preference, never a deficit.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by research on perceived partner responsiveness and disclosure in intimacy (Reis, as reviewed in adult attachment research) and on safe-haven support (Feeney & Collins).
Aspirational courtship
- Definition
- The degree to which someone actively tries to intrigue, impress, delight, challenge, or inspire a romantic partner through who they are, what they create, what they accomplish, or who they are becoming.
- What it is not
- Not reducible to appearance or sexual attractiveness — beauty-based courtship is only one subtype, alongside intellectual, creative, achievement, experiential, erotic, and growth courtship. It is also not a requirement: nothing here implies partners must perform for one another.
- Example
- Learning a skill partly because a partner will appreciate it, or creating something specifically to make their eyes light up.
- Related constructs
- Vulnerability intimacy · Admiration-activated growth · Desire
- How BondPrint explores it
- Optional scenarios about what changes when fascination fades, and behavioral-frequency questions about deliberate attempts to surprise or delight — never direct "are you romantic?" items.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by self-expansion theory (Aron & Aron) and research distinguishing desire from attachment (Fisher).
Mutual expansion loop
- Definition
- A relational feedback process in which one partner's admiration, enthusiasm, challenge, or responsiveness motivates growth, creativity, effort, or self-expression in the other — which then generates further engagement in return.
- What it is not
- Not a performance requirement or a test a relationship must pass. The loop can be strong, asymmetric, dormant, caregiving-dominant, courtship-dominant, or mutual only in specific domains — these are shapes, not grades.
- Example
- One partner shares a half-finished project; the other's visible delight makes finishing it feel worthwhile — and the finished thing draws them closer still.
- Related constructs
- Aspirational courtship · Admiration-activated growth · Recognition and appreciation
- How BondPrint explores it
- As descriptive framing only: one optional, never-scored question asks which shape the loop currently takes in your closest bond.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by self-expansion theory (Aron & Aron), capitalization and responsiveness research (Feeney & Collins), and observational research on appreciation (Gottman).
Admiration-activated growth
- Definition
- The degree to which a particular partner's admiration or delight increases someone's motivation to create, achieve, express, or develop.
- What it is not
- Not generalized praise-seeking and not a narcissistic need for admiration — the person you love may simply function as a uniquely meaningful audience. Motivation that runs on its own fuel is an equally legitimate shape.
- Example
- Noticing that you attempt larger things in seasons when someone you love is visibly delighted by what you make.
- Related constructs
- Aspirational courtship · Mutual expansion loop · Autonomy
- How BondPrint explores it
- Optional scenario and trade-off questions about what most strongly refuels your effort — private satisfaction, or a loved one's visible response.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by self-expansion theory (Aron & Aron), autonomy and intrinsic motivation research (Deci & Ryan), and secure-base support for exploration (Feeney & Collins).
Temporal bond orientation
- Definition
- Where a relationship's meaning lives in time for a particular person: in the richness of the present (experiential bonding), in a felt shared direction (trajectory bonding), or in both at once. BondPrint reads this as a map with several currents — present intensity, future coherence, meaning-through-direction — never one score.
- What it is not
- Not a maturity scale. Bonding through the present is not casualness or inability to commit, and bonding through direction is not conditionality — an "integrated" reading is a description, never a superior type.
- Example
- One person feels the bond most in an unplanned perfect evening; another feels it most when they can sense that this year belongs to a longer shared story.
- Related constructs
- Shared trajectory · Commitment · Bonding
- How BondPrint explores it
- Optional forced-choice and scenario questions that trade the extraordinary present against a felt direction — plus direct anchors for each orientation.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by commitment research distinguishing dedication from constraint (Stanley & Markman) and investment-model research (Rusbult).
Trajectory and possibility attraction
- Definition
- The degree to which attraction responds to who a partner is becoming — their direction, agency, and unrealized possibility — alongside who they already are.
- What it is not
- Not conditional love and not a preference for ambition over quiet lives. It measures fit between attraction and perceived direction; noticing attraction shift when a partner's direction changes is not controlling, and fame or visibility is never treated as universally attractive.
- Example
- Feeling drawn to the horizon around a person — the sense that they are in motion — as one current of attraction among others.
- Related constructs
- Temporal bond orientation · Aspirational courtship · Autonomy
- How BondPrint explores it
- Optional scenarios about a partner choosing a dramatically different life, plus anchors about attraction to becoming — with an optional visibility facet.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by self-expansion theory (Aron & Aron) and autonomy research (Deci & Ryan).
Relational fascination
- Definition
- Ongoing curiosity about who a partner is and is becoming — deliberately read in two directions: the fascination you give, and the fascination you need to receive.
- What it is not
- Not the same as love, trust, admiration, sexual attraction, or security. Fascination can quiet while love remains fully intact — and unlike some things, it can be deliberately rewoken. Its decline is a hypothesis about a current state, never a verdict.
- Example
- Realizing you cannot remember the last thing you learned about your partner that surprised you — while still loving them without question.
- Related constructs
- Aspirational courtship · Mutual expansion loop · Recognition and appreciation
- How BondPrint explores it
- Separate optional anchors for fascination given and fascination received — the two can differ substantially within the same person and the same bond.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by self-expansion theory (Aron & Aron) and responsiveness research (Reis, via Feeney & Collins).
Reciprocal aspiration
- Definition
- Wanting a loved one's developing self in the relationship — their discoveries, attempts, and becoming, not only their struggles — and wanting to bring one's own in return.
- What it is not
- Not a demand that partners perform or achieve. A bond built mostly on care and presence is an equally legitimate shape; this construct only names a different exchange some people also need.
- Example
- Missing not your partner's help but their ambitions — noticing they now bring you their worries and never what they are excited about.
- Related constructs
- Relational fascination · Mutual expansion loop · Caregiving
- How BondPrint explores it
- Optional trade-off questions about which loss would leave the biggest hole over time, where every option names a real form of closeness.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by self-expansion theory (Aron & Aron) and capitalization research (Feeney & Collins).
Desirability-amplified choice
- Definition
- The pattern in which a partner's genuine desirability to others amplifies the felt meaning of their choice of you — the more real their alternatives, the more their staying signifies.
- What it is not
- Kept strictly separate from two neighbouring patterns: enjoying that others admire your partner (reflected status) and enjoying being the one with exclusive access (possessive exclusivity). BondPrint records those as descriptive evidence only and never collapses the three — and none of them is framed as a wrong way to feel.
- Example
- A partner's unprompted "I would choose you again" landing more deeply because you know the choice is real.
- Related constructs
- Feeling chosen · Freedom and choice · Commitment
- How BondPrint explores it
- One optional scenario that separates the three patterns, plus a direct anchor about alternatives making choice meaningful.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by dedication versus constraint commitment research (Stanley & Markman) and autonomy research (Deci & Ryan).
Reciprocal chosen expansion
- Definition
- A higher-order interpretive pattern BondPrint surfaces only when several readings run high together — freely chosen commitment, autonomy-supportive provision, mutual growth and opportunity creation, trajectory bonding, and admiration flowing in both directions. Its core: freedom without detachment, growth without abandonment, provision without dependency, admiration flowing in both directions.
- What it is not
- Never an ideal type, a compatibility score, or a grade of relationship quality. It is one constellation among many — most thriving bonds do not show it, and its absence means nothing is missing.
- Example
- Two people who fund each other's freedom, are visibly fascinated by each other's becoming, and keep choosing each other precisely because neither has to.
- Related constructs
- Desirability-amplified choice · Reciprocal aspiration · Mutual expansion loop
- How BondPrint explores it
- Never asked about directly — noted as an interpretive pattern only when its component readings are individually strong, and always offered as a hypothesis.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis drawing together self-expansion (Aron & Aron), autonomy support (Deci & Ryan), secure-base caregiving (Feeney & Collins), and dedication research (Stanley & Markman).
Identity-confirming attraction
- Definition
- The pattern in which part of what draws you to someone is the version of yourself you become in their eyes — attraction partly to the reflected self, alongside attraction to the person.
- What it is not
- Not vanity, insecurity, or validation-seeking. Both the person and the reflection can be genuinely loved at once, and BondPrint never ranks the two currents.
- Example
- Realizing you are funnier, braver, or more articulate around one particular person — and that this is part of the pull.
- Related constructs
- Reflected identity value · Admiration salience · Feeling chosen
- How BondPrint explores it
- One optional counterfactual choice separating attraction to the person from attraction to the reflected self, plus a direct anchor.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by self-expansion research (Aron & Aron) and intrinsic-motivation research (Deci & Ryan). The reflected-appraisal ("looking-glass self") tradition is directly relevant; a verified primary source is required before publication and is intentionally not yet cited.
Reflected identity value
- Definition
- The weight a loved one's view of you carries as a source of your own self-understanding — how much their story about who you are becomes part of how you see yourself.
- What it is not
- Not weakness or a missing sense of self. Reflected appraisal is a widely observed social process; people differ only in how much of their identity runs through it.
- Example
- Noticing that you believe in a quality of yours mostly because one person keeps insisting they see it.
- Related constructs
- Identity-confirming attraction · Identity-disconfirming loss · Recognition and appreciation
- How BondPrint explores it
- Two optional direct anchors, plus a descriptive question about which concrete signal carries the reflected self.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by partner responsiveness research (Reis) and adult attachment research (Mikulincer & Shaver). The reflected-appraisal ("looking-glass self") tradition is directly relevant; a verified primary source is required before publication and is intentionally not yet cited.
Admiration salience
- Definition
- How much feeling admired by the person you love feeds the felt romance of a bond — the visibility of their admiration as a bonding channel.
- What it is not
- Never framed as admiration dependence, neediness, or praise-seeking. The person someone loves can function as a uniquely meaningful audience, and low salience is a preference, never superiority.
- Example
- A relationship where everything stays — care, trust, loyalty — while admiration quietly fades, and something important still feels missing.
- Related constructs
- Reciprocal aspiration · Identity-confirming attraction · Recognition and appreciation
- How BondPrint explores it
- One optional scenario about admiration fading while everything else stays, a direct anchor, and a separate never-scored question about current sensitivity to keep states from being read as traits.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by partner responsiveness and capitalization research (Reis) and self-expansion research (Aron & Aron).
Desirability-amplified validation
- Definition
- The pattern in which admiration from someone you yourself find impressive and freely choosing carries more weight than the same admiration from anyone else.
- What it is not
- Not a status game and never evidence of insecurity. It is the validation-side sibling of desirability-amplified choice, and BondPrint keeps the two connected but distinct.
- Example
- The same compliment landing differently from a person whose own standards you deeply respect.
- Related constructs
- Desirability-amplified choice · Admiration salience · Feeling chosen
- How BondPrint explores it
- One optional scenario comparing the same words from different sources, plus a direct anchor.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by responsiveness research (Reis) and self-expansion research (Aron & Aron).
Power confirmation
- Definition
- The pattern in which a strong, self-sufficient person's freely chosen softening — leaning on you, deferring, letting you lead — confirms something meaningful about who you are to them.
- What it is not
- Not a wish for control, and never entitlement. Its meaning depends entirely on the surrender staying freely chosen and revocable: provision, status, or authority never create entitlement to anyone's deference.
- Example
- Someone who needs nothing practical from you choosing, on an ordinary evening, to let you carry the weight.
- Related constructs
- Autonomous choice value · Freedom and choice · Provisioning and opportunity creation
- How BondPrint explores it
- One optional scenario about a free person's chosen softening, plus a direct anchor — always paired with the entitlement caution.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by autonomy research (Deci & Ryan) and secure-base caregiving research (Feeney & Collins).
Public identity confirmation
- Definition
- How much the bond existing in front of others — being claimed, witnessed, and acknowledged where people can see — matters to what a partner's valuing of you means.
- What it is not
- Not vanity or appearance-management. For many people a version of themselves only fully exists once witnessed; for others private reality carries all the meaning. Both are legitimate preferences.
- Example
- A bond rich in private but invisible in public, and the slow question of what the privacy means.
- Related constructs
- Public acknowledgment · Feeling chosen · Reflected identity value
- How BondPrint explores it
- Two optional anchors keyed in opposite directions, plus a descriptive question differentiating what public acknowledgment would carry — witness, claim, reflected identity, or trust in meaning.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by dedication research (Stanley & Markman) and responsiveness research (Reis).
Autonomous choice value
- Definition
- The pattern in which being chosen by someone entirely free not to choose you — someone who needs nothing and stays anyway — is among the deepest confirmations love can give.
- What it is not
- Never implies relationships involving dependence mean less, and never a demand that a partner become independent. It maps closely onto freedom-choice valuation in the Freedom & Choice module.
- Example
- A partner's staying meaning more, not less, on the day they no longer need anything practical from you.
- Related constructs
- Freedom and choice · Desirability-amplified choice · Power confirmation
- How BondPrint explores it
- One optional scenario about a partner becoming maximally free and staying, plus a direct anchor.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by autonomy research (Deci & Ryan) and investment-model research (Rusbult).
Identity-disconfirming loss
- Definition
- The sensitivity to a partner's changed gaze — being seen as ordinary where you were once seen as extraordinary — registering as its own loss, separate from whatever happens to the relationship. A fading gaze can carry two losses at once: the relationship, and the reflected identity.
- What it is not
- Never fragility, and never a verdict on the person or the bond. Outsized grief around distance or endings can be identity grief — information worth having, not a flaw.
- Example
- A breakup that hurts twice: losing the person, and losing the version of yourself that lived in their eyes.
- Related constructs
- Reflected identity value · Admiration salience · Grief and meaning shift
- How BondPrint explores it
- Two optional direct anchors about the changed gaze and the disappearing reflected self — always framed as sensitivity readings, never diagnoses.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint synthesis informed by adult attachment research (Mikulincer & Shaver) and self-expansion research (Aron & Aron). The reflected-appraisal ("looking-glass self") tradition is directly relevant; a verified primary source is required before publication and is intentionally not yet cited.
Symbolic partner function
- Definition
- An interpretive lens for what a partner may stand for beyond who they are — proof of being lovable, home, safety, aliveness, becoming, worth, redemption, continuity, or vitality. A partner can be deeply loved for themselves and carry symbolic meaning at the same time.
- What it is not
- Never scored, never a claim that the love is "really about" the symbol, and never a verdict. BondPrint records one self-described hypothesis and does not decide which interpretation is correct.
- Example
- Noticing that a partner's presence quietly answers an old question — and that the answer matters alongside the person.
- Related constructs
- Reflected identity value · Relationship centrality · Grief and meaning shift
- How BondPrint explores it
- One optional, never-scored question offering candidate symbols plus "none" — treated purely as a self-interpretation.
- Research basis
- A BondPrint interpretive frame informed by adult attachment research (Mikulincer & Shaver) and dedication research (Stanley & Markman); offered as vocabulary, not measurement.
How results are held
BondPrint separates baseline tendencies, current state, and relationship-specific context, and presents every reading as a pattern or hypothesis with its evidence visible — never as a diagnosis, prediction, or verdict. Results are meant to help you ask better questions, not tell you what decisions to make.
BondPrint